By Emmanuel Mihiingo Kaija
Uganda experienced a profound setback in the management of its public finances during the fiscal year 2023/24, with estimates indicating that nearly 25% of the national budget—equivalent to UGX 9.1 trillion, or approximately $2.3 billion—was lost due to corruption and mismanagement. This substantial financial loss reflects a deeply entrenched pattern of inefficiency, political interference, and weak institutional oversight that has characterized Uganda’s public sector for decades. Reports from the Inspectorate of Government (IGG) and parliamentary oversight bodies highlight that these losses were not confined to isolated incidents but were spread across multiple ministries, local governments, and quasi-governmental institutions, pointing to systemic challenges in public financial management. The diversion of such a large portion of the national budget has far-reaching implications, undermining the government’s ability to provide essential services, invest in development projects, and sustain economic growth, while eroding public confidence in the state’s ability to manage its resources responsibly.
The primary factors contributing to this massive loss of public funds are multifaceted and deeply interconnected. Corruption in public procurement has been identified as one of the most significant drivers, involving practices such as inflated contract prices, favoritism in tender awards, and the procurement of substandard or unnecessary goods and services. For example, audits have revealed that government contracts for infrastructure projects frequently exceed market rates, with portions of the funds siphoned off to private accounts linked to public officials or politically connected individuals. Additionally, the phenomenon of “ghost employees” and inflated pension and gratuity payments further compounds financial losses. Audits have documented the disbursement of tens of billions of Ugandan shillings to individuals who were either non-existent or ineligible, revealing flaws in payroll oversight and human resources management within the public sector. Weak enforcement of anti-corruption laws has allowed these practices to persist; despite the existence of the Anti-Corruption Act and the National Anti-Corruption Strategy, prosecutions are sporadic, penalties are inconsistently applied, and many perpetrators operate with near impunity. The combination of these structural, procedural, and enforcement deficiencies has created an environment where mismanagement and embezzlement can thrive, leaving critical public services underfunded and development initiatives hampered.
The consequences of such financial mismanagement extend beyond mere numbers on a ledger and are felt tangibly in the everyday lives of Ugandans. The diversion of funds meant for public health has resulted in hospitals operating with insufficient medical equipment, medicines, and staff, compromising patient care and public health outcomes. Similarly, the education sector has suffered from delayed school infrastructure projects, insufficient teaching materials, and the inability to adequately remunerate teachers, negatively affecting learning outcomes nationwide. Infrastructure projects, including road construction, water supply, and sanitation initiatives, are often left incomplete or of substandard quality due to misappropriation of funds. These failures in service delivery disproportionately affect vulnerable populations, particularly rural communities and low-income urban households, who rely most heavily on government-provided services for basic survival and economic opportunity. The misallocation of resources also undermines poverty alleviation programs and social safety nets, creating a cycle of vulnerability where citizens are deprived of the support necessary to achieve economic and social mobility.
In response to these challenges, Uganda has taken a series of measures aimed at recovery and reform. The IGG has actively pursued the recovery of stolen public funds, reportedly reclaiming UGX 7.9 billion from misappropriated resources, though this represents only a fraction of the total losses. Forensic audits, including those conducted on key institutions such as the Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA), have provided empirical evidence of financial mismanagement, helping to identify loopholes and inform corrective actions. Civil society organizations have played a critical role in advocating for transparency and accountability, mobilizing public awareness campaigns, and pressuring government agencies to enforce anti-corruption regulations. Despite these efforts, challenges remain, particularly in terms of political interference, limited institutional capacity, and public disengagement in governance processes. Experts argue that meaningful reform will require not only recovery of lost funds but also systemic improvements in governance, stronger oversight mechanisms, and sustained political will to combat entrenched corruption.
In conclusion, the loss of nearly a quarter of Uganda’s public funds during the fiscal year 2023/24 underscores the urgent need for comprehensive reforms in financial management and governance. Addressing these challenges requires a multifaceted approach that combines institutional strengthening, consistent enforcement of anti-corruption laws, transparency in public procurement, and active citizen participation in monitoring government expenditures. Without such reforms, the cycle of mismanagement will continue to erode public trust, hinder economic development, and limit access to essential services, leaving the most vulnerable populations at risk. Ensuring that public funds are effectively and equitably utilized is not merely a fiscal necessity but a moral imperative, central to the nation’s ability to achieve sustainable development, social justice, and long-term prosperity.
References
Afrobarometer. (2025, February 4). Ugandans dissatisfied with government anti-corruption efforts. Afrobarometer. https://www.afrobarometer.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/AD942-Ugandans-dissatisfied-with-government-anti-corruption-efforts-Afrobarometer-4feb25.pdf
Monitor. (2024). Uganda lost Shs30b to corruption in FY2023-24, says IGG. The Monitor. https://www.monitor.co.ug/uganda/news/national/uganda-lost-shs30b-to-corruption-in-fy2023-24-says-igg-4755738
Parliament of Uganda. (2024). PAC report lays bare billions lost in government projects. Parliament of Uganda. https://www.parliament.go.ug/news/4194/pac-report-lays-bare-billions-lost-govt-projects
Inspectorate of Government. (2024). IGG recovered UGX 7.9 billion from corrupt officials in FY 2023/24. ARINSA. https://arinsa.org/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=1215
Office of the Auditor General. (2024). Report of the Auditor General on the Inspectorate of Government for the audit year ended December 2024. Office of the Auditor General Uganda. https://www.oag.go.ug/storage/reports/ACC_FIIT_AGCY_2023_24_1739690633.pdf
ResearchGate. (2024). Exploring the efficiency of the Inspectorate of Government in anti-corruption regime in Uganda. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383083665_Exploring_the_Efficiency_of_the_Inspectorate_of_Government_in_Anti-Corruption_Regime_in_Uganda
Reuters. (2024, April 30). Britain sanctions three Ugandan officials under anti-corruption laws. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/britain-sanctions-three-ugandan-officials-under-anti-corruption-laws-2024-04-30
Reuters. (2024, June 13). Three Uganda lawmakers charged with corruption, court papers show. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/three-uganda-lawmakers-charged-with-corruption-court-papers-show-2024-06-13
Associated Press. (2024). An online protest movement exposes corruption in Uganda. Associated Press. https://apnews.com/article/93c139562805c3ffa77b0bf92d14e6c5
Transparency International. (2024). 2024 corruption perceptions index: Uganda. U.S. Department of State. https://www.state.gov/reports/2024-investment-climate-statements/uganda
