Ghana’s Suspended Chief Justice Calls Her Removal From Office Proceedings ‘Mockery Of Justice’

Justice Gertrude Torkornoo

Source: Africa Publicity

The suspended Chief Justice of Ghana, Gertrude Torkornoo, has slamed the proceedings investigating the petitions for her removal from office, describing the proceedings as “mockery of justice.”

She sharply condemned the Justice Justice Pwamang Committee’s handling of her removal from office proceedings so far.

According to her, the proceedings are a “ruse” to unjustly remove her from office.

In a supplementary affidavit filed with the Supreme Court, Justice Torkornoo alleges that the committee’s proceedings have violated her dignity and fundamental rights.

Allegations of Unfair Treatment

Justice Torkornoo claims that the committee’s actions have been inhumane and degrading, citing the denial of access to her mobile phones, invasive body searches, and refusal to admit her husband and children into the hearing room. In contrast, she asserts that petitioners’ counsel and clients were allowed mobile phone access and received preferential treatment.

Concerns Over Transparency and Fairness

Justice Torkornoo has also raised concerns about the committee’s failure to provide the legal basis or criteria for establishing a prima facie case against her, arguing that this lack of transparency hinders her ability to understand her rights and prepare an adequate defense. She further disputes the committee’s decision to allow petitioners to present evidence through witnesses rather than appear in person.

Venue of Hearings Criticized

The Chief Justice has criticized the choice of venue for the hearings, which are being held in a high-security zone at Osu Castle, unlike previous similar inquiries conducted at the Judicial Service’s Court Complex. She describes the current setting as inappropriate and intimidating, arguing that it constitutes a deliberate attempt to apply psychological pressure on her.

Legal Challenge

Justice Torkornoo’s supplementary affidavit is part of her legal challenge against the Justice Pwamang Committee’s proceedings. The outcome of this challenge will determine the fate of the committee’s investigation and the Chief Justice’s position.