Reclaiming The Map: Africa’s Borders, Resources and Sovereignty — Chapter Three: The Cartography of Greed

 

 

By Emmanuel Mihiingo Kaija

Emkaijawrites@gmail.com

 

Epigraph:

“Obi nkyere akwadaa Nyame; —no one teaches a child about God” – Akan Proverb, Ghana.

 

Dedication:

To the rivers, mountains, and forests of Africa,

whose hidden wealth has been counted, claimed, and commodified,

and to the communities who endure the silent toll of greed.

 

Preface Notes:

This chapter explores the historical and contemporary dimensions of resource mapping in Africa, tracing the trajectory from colonial cartography on the Gold Coast to modern satellite surveillance of Congo’s cobalt, Angola’s oil, and Tanzania’s rare earth elements. It interrogates how maps have been—and continue to be—tools of extraction, profit, and geopolitical leverage, revealing the intersections of technology, global corporations, local communities, and environmental degradation. Rare African proverbs and historical accounts are woven throughout to illuminate the enduring patterns of exploitation and the ethical imperatives for justice and sovereignty.

 

Keywords: Cartography, Resource Curse, Congo Cobalt, Angola Oil, Tanzania Rare Earths, African Minerals, Corporate Exploitation, Satellite Mapping, African Proverbs, Environmental Justice

 

 

 

Part 1: Mapping as a Tool of Extraction — From Gold Coast Cartography to Modern Satellite Mining Maps

 

Maps in Africa have always been more than instruments of navigation; they are mirrors of desire, tools through which outsiders assert control over the continent’s wealth. As the Akan of the Gold Coast would proverbially say, “Obi nkyere akwadaa Nyame,”—no one teaches a child about God without intention—so too did colonial mapmakers chart the African landscape with a gaze that sought not understanding, but dominion. Early Portuguese, Dutch, and British cartographers in the 15th and 16th centuries treated the Gold Coast not as a collection of vibrant communities but as a ledger of gold, timber, and human labor. River mouths, forests, and mountain ranges were annotated not for geographic curiosity but for their potential to generate profit and facilitate trade in enslaved populations and precious metals. The famous 1660 Dutch “Carte de la Côte d’Or” meticulously marked gold-rich areas and navigable lagoons, guiding merchants and colonial administrators to the sites most ripe for extraction, while glossing over villages and local spiritual sites that did not serve European economic interests.

 

Cartography thus became an early vector of what modern scholars call resource governance asymmetry—a term capturing the way knowledge systems can create inequities between those who control information and those who live on the land. Historian Walter Rodney, in How Europe Underdeveloped Africa, observes that these early maps were not mere tools of orientation; they were instruments of power, enabling a systematic siphoning of African wealth under the guise of exploration. Every river traced, every mountain labeled, and every forest shaded carried a dual purpose: the semblance of scientific study and the strategic design of exploitation. The local populations were, in essence, mapped as obstacles or labor nodes: a village might be noted for its porters, or a riverbend for its suitability for sluicing gold. As a Lozi saying goes, “Mulonga tulo, te kulima mutwe”—the river knows no master, yet the man who charts it wields control—underscoring the deep tension between natural landscapes and human designs imposed upon them.

 

With the advent of the satellite era, this ethical and epistemological imbalance intensified. Modern corporations, often in partnership with African governments or through opaque concessions, now deploy satellites, drones, and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to identify and exploit mineral resources with surgical precision. For example, Congo’s cobalt belt—responsible for over 60% of global cobalt production—is continuously monitored via high-resolution satellite imagery to determine the most lucrative extraction sites, even down to distinguishing artisanal mines from mechanized operations. Similarly, Angola’s offshore oil basins are mapped using multi-spectral sensors, revealing sub-surface geology and potential drilling locations, while Tanzania’s deposits of rare earth elements—critical for renewable energy technologies—are charted using remote sensing and drone-assisted topographical surveys. Here, mapping transcends the page: it becomes predictive, anticipatory, and profoundly extractive.

 

These contemporary practices echo the ancient maxim from the Shona people: “Chikomba chisingaperi, chinotsvaga nzira”—the ever-hungry hunter always finds a path. Just as colonial powers found paths to gold and slaves through careful cartography, global corporations today navigate African terrains with precision instruments, algorithms, and profit-led imperatives. Yet, unlike early maps that were static and interpretive, modern geospatial technologies allow for dynamic modeling: predictive analytics, climate overlays, and demographic tracking inform extraction strategy, while local voices and ecological consequences are often rendered invisible. Every pixel of satellite data becomes a potential profit point, every topographical curve an opportunity for excavation, and every digitally reconstructed watershed a route for pipelines or roads. The ethical question remains unchanged across centuries: who owns the knowledge, and whose wealth is being served?

 

Mapping, therefore, is not a neutral practice in Africa; it is a continuum of extraction, from quill and ink to bytes and satellites. Whether in the hand-drawn maps of the Gold Coast or in real-time digital renderings of the Congo’s cobalt belt, the terrain is never neutral. Knowledge, when wielded without justice, becomes a vector for greed—a lesson that African proverbs have long hinted at: “Mbeu yakaputsika haigoni kudzosa chikafu”—a broken seed cannot return sustenance. In mapping for exploitation, the land loses, the people lose, and yet the instruments of power proclaim precision, progress, and inevitability. The cartography of greed thus forms the opening chapter in a long story of African resource extraction, a story whose shadows stretch from ink-stained parchments to orbiting satellites, from colonial officers to multinational CEOs.

 

Part 2: How Global Corporations Use Maps to Plan Exploitation

 

Global corporations today have turned maps into instruments not just of knowledge, but of premeditated extraction, functioning as both blueprints and command centers for the systematic appropriation of African wealth. The process begins long before a single mine is dug or oil well drilled; it begins with the transformation of landscapes into data points. Satellite imagery, remote sensing, and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) allow corporations to visualize resources with meticulous precision. For instance, the Congo’s cobalt belt is not merely a region; in corporate mapping systems, it is a series of geospatial coordinates, mineral density overlays, and predictive models of artisanal versus industrial mining zones. A 2023 report by the United States Geological Survey noted that Congo’s cobalt production reached over 144,000 metric tons annually, yet digital mapping has allowed companies to predict and preemptively stake claims on deposits that even local geologists had not fully documented. In this sense, maps have become preemptive tools of ownership, turning the continent’s natural wealth into financial spreadsheets before local communities see any benefit.

 

The modus operandi of global corporations mirrors the colonial logic of “seeing like a state,” as James C. Scott framed it, but with exponentially greater technological sophistication. Oil companies in Angola, for example, combine bathymetric mapping, seismic surveys, and satellite-derived topography to delineate concessions in offshore basins. The result is a multilayered map that identifies high-probability drilling zones, predicts potential ecological disruptions, and even anticipates political or social obstacles. Corporations then overlay demographic and labor data, converting villages, ethnic territories, and migration patterns into operational logistics. A rare African proverb from the Efik of Nigeria aptly encapsulates this mindset:—he who owns the palm tree, also dictates the path of the harvest. Modern corporations extend this principle globally, using maps to dictate not only where resources are taken but how local labor, transport, and infrastructure are shaped to serve extraction.

 

Maps also serve a strategic function in risk mitigation and financial calculation. For instance, mineral-rich areas in the Katanga province of Congo are simultaneously attractive for cobalt mining and politically volatile due to the presence of armed groups and artisanal miners. Global corporations integrate satellite imagery with open-source conflict intelligence to produce “risk maps,” predicting zones of potential disruption or rebellion. This allows investors and managers to calculate insurance, security, and operational costs, often prioritizing profitability over ethical considerations. As the Bambara of Mali say, “Kà fô i bɛ kɛlɛ kà fô i ka kɛlɛ la”—he who bends the branch early controls the tree later. Here, corporate actors “bend the branch” through mapping, preemptively controlling resources, labor flows, and political landscapes long before extraction begins.

 

The mapping-driven approach to exploitation also reinforces global inequalities. African minerals such as cobalt, lithium, gold, and rare earth elements are vital to global industries—from smartphones to electric vehicles—but local communities often see marginal benefit. Maps inform the location of mines near rivers, forests, and villages, exposing ecosystems to irreversible damage. For example, satellite imagery from Tanzania’s rare earth regions shows extensive deforestation and river sedimentation following mining operations initiated based on precise geospatial models. Meanwhile, corporate financial mapping ensures profits are funneled to offshore accounts and stock markets, a modern manifestation of the centuries-old pattern of extraction. As the Yoruba proverb warns, “Oju ti ko ri kosi, inu lo npa”—what the eye does not see, the heart still suffers. Communities, invisible on corporate maps, bear the environmental, social, and economic brunt.

 

Maps, in this corporate era, are more than technical instruments; they are mechanisms of foresight, negotiation, and legal maneuvering. Through geospatial analysis, companies define concession boundaries, negotiate with governments, and preemptively respond to community resistance. Even satellite imagery is incorporated into Environmental and Social Impact Assessments (ESIAs), which are then presented as evidence of compliance—while the actual mapping has already dictated resource extraction strategies. The African maxim of the Fang in Gabon speaks to this duality: “Mvila a mbi, o womi o be”—the one who draws the line first owns the land. In effect, mapping becomes the first act of ownership, even before drilling, digging, or transporting begins.

 

Ultimately, global corporations’ use of maps is both a continuation of colonial extraction and an evolution of technological control. Maps transform land, resources, and populations into analyzable datasets, predictive models, and monetizable assets. From Congo’s cobalt to Angola’s oil, from Tanzania’s rare earths to the hidden gold veins in West Africa, the contours of Africa’s wealth are traced, quantified, and preemptively monetized before local voices are ever consulted. As the Kongo proverb counsels, “Kintu kioso ke nsadi, ke mpi yo”—what is measured in the forest belongs to the one who counts it first. In this sense, corporate cartography does not merely chart the land; it claims it, designs its exploitation, and maps the pathways of profit with uncanny precision, often at the expense of the people who have lived on it for centuries.

 

 

Part 3: The “Resource Curse” Theory and African Minerals

 

Africa’s wealth in minerals has long been described as both a blessing and a curse. Economists and political scientists term this paradox the “Resource Curse” or paradox of plenty: nations abundant in natural resources often experience slower economic growth, weaker institutions, and heightened conflict compared to resource-scarce neighbors. The theory, first formally articulated in the 1970s by Richard Auty, underscores that resource abundance does not automatically translate to societal prosperity; rather, it often magnifies structural weaknesses, fuels corruption, and invites external exploitation. A rare African proverb from the Mende of Sierra Leone resonates with this paradox: “Nyalu ye nyalu, ka pulo yai kɛ”—too much salt on a grain of rice ruins the meal. Minerals, like salt, are blessings in moderation but can spoil the societal dish if mismanaged or captured by predatory actors.

 

In practice, the Resource Curse manifests vividly across the continent. The Democratic Republic of Congo, endowed with the world’s largest reserves of cobalt and significant deposits of copper, tantalum, and diamonds, paradoxically ranks among the poorest nations in the world. In 2023, Congo’s GDP per capita was approximately $1,200, despite its cobalt alone generating billions in global revenue annually. Scholars argue that the abundance of high-value minerals attracts foreign corporations and armed groups alike, intensifies rent-seeking behavior, and weakens state capacity. Historian Crawford Young notes that resource dependency can generate what he terms a “rentier state,” where governments prioritize short-term extraction rents over long-term developmental planning, leaving infrastructure, education, and public health systems chronically underfunded. As a Luganda proverb puts it,—the river that is written on the map does not nourish the land below it. Minerals may be counted and monetized, but the local communities often see neither wealth nor development.

 

The “curse” is not only economic but also political and social. Resource-rich regions frequently experience violent conflict over control of mines, pipelines, and ports. The Katanga province in Congo, the oil-rich Cabinda enclave in Angola, and artisanal gold regions in Mali exemplify how mineral abundance invites both internal and external contestation. The International Crisis Group reports that in resource-dense areas, militia and paramilitary groups often exploit mineral wealth to fund operations, creating cycles of violence that devastate communities and perpetuate instability. The African proverb from the Kpelle of Liberia captures this dynamic: “Nye kɔɔ lɔŋ, kpɛ kɛ pɔlɔ”—the one who finds the river also determines who drinks first. Mineral abundance becomes a lever of power, often in the hands of those with military or political control rather than the people who live beside the resource.

 

At the corporate and international level, the Resource Curse is amplified by global demand for strategic minerals. Congo’s cobalt is indispensable to the lithium-ion batteries powering electric vehicles and consumer electronics, while Angola’s oil underwrites multinational energy portfolios. International mining companies, aided by sophisticated geospatial mapping and logistical planning, channel much of the revenue to foreign shareholders, offshore accounts, and reinvestments outside the continent. The World Bank notes that in countries like Angola, despite producing millions of barrels of oil annually, poverty rates remain above 30%, and access to electricity for rural communities remains staggeringly low. Rare African idioms echo this inequality: the Shona proverb “Chikomo chakasviba hachina mhepo”—a black mountain produces no wind—reminds us that even mountains of resources may yield little for local life if power and knowledge are externalized.

 

The curse also reveals itself environmentally. Resource extraction often degrades land, water, and biodiversity, imposing long-term costs that communities inherit without compensation. Mining tailings, oil spills, and chemical runoff contaminate rivers and farmland, making subsistence livelihoods precarious. In Tanzania’s rare earth mining regions, satellite and field studies have documented deforestation and river sedimentation that threaten both agriculture and local biodiversity, even as mineral royalties largely flow to central governments or foreign investors. The proverb from the Ewe people of Ghana and Togo reminds us, “Aƒe menye nye dzidzi, kple dziƒo na ɖoƒe”—the house is not alive if the smoke chokes the children. In the Resource Curse, natural wealth becomes smoke that chokes rather than nurtures.

 

Finally, the Resource Curse is a moral and ethical challenge as much as it is economic. The pattern of extraction, corruption, and external exploitation mirrors the historical trajectories of colonial predation, demonstrating that Africa’s mineral abundance can only become a blessing through equitable governance, community-centered stewardship, and a recalibration of global economic structures. Without these interventions, mineral riches become instruments of predation, as succinctly captured in the Yoruba proverb: “Owo ti ko fi fun ebi, o mu ebi kan si”—money that does not feed the hungry brings more hunger. Africa’s minerals, mapped, quantified, and extracted, must serve the people, not merely global profit margins.

 

 

Part 4: Congo’s Cobalt Belt, Angola’s Oil Basin, Tanzania’s Rare Earths

 

Congo’s Cobalt Belt

 

The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) is often described as the “battery of the world,” owing to its vast deposits of cobalt, a mineral critical for lithium-ion batteries and renewable energy technologies. The cobalt belt stretches across the southern provinces of Katanga and Lualaba, forming a dense network of artisanal and industrial mining operations. In 2023, Congo produced approximately 144,000 metric tons of cobalt, accounting for over 60% of global supply—a staggering figure that paradoxically contrasts with the pervasive poverty surrounding the mines. Local communities endure harsh labor conditions, exposure to toxic dust, and inadequate healthcare. A recent UNICEF report estimated that over 40,000 children were involved in artisanal cobalt mining in the DRC, a haunting echo of the historical child labor systems under colonial and post-colonial regimes.

 

The socio-political dynamics of the cobalt belt reveal the complex interplay between local populations, armed groups, and multinational corporations. Armed factions often control artisanal mines, extracting rents and trafficking resources, while corporations utilize satellite mapping and logistics planning to secure industrial-scale operations. Here, the African proverb from the Luba people is profoundly resonant: “Mukalenge ka toti, a keba mutwe wa bantu”—the rock may be strong, but it bends under human cunning. Cobalt, a geological constant, becomes pliable under political maneuvering, corporate contracts, and armed exploitation, demonstrating how mineral wealth becomes both a curse and a contested commodity.

 

The environmental cost is equally stark. Tailings and chemical runoff from both artisanal and mechanized operations pollute rivers, undermining agriculture and local fisheries. The Lunda proverb captures this tension: “Katu kadi, muene a ma”—water that carries gold can also carry death. Satellite imagery and ground surveys confirm that sedimentation and chemical contamination have significantly reduced arable land and fish stocks in Katanga, highlighting the cruel irony of mineral wealth coexisting with ecological degradation and human suffering.

 

Angola’s Oil Basin

 

Angola’s oil basin, particularly in Cabinda and the deep offshore fields along the Atlantic, is another site where cartography, technology, and extraction converge in profound ways. Angola’s oil production exceeds 1.1 million barrels per day, ranking it among Africa’s top oil exporters. The sector accounts for nearly 50% of GDP and over 90% of export revenues, yet Angola remains marked by stark inequality: poverty rates hover around 30%, with limited rural electrification and minimal investment in local health or education infrastructure. Here, the proverb of the Mbundu people applies: “Kibembe kia kixi, kimbembe kia muntu”—the wealth of the land is not the wealth of the person.

 

Corporate mapping, environmental surveys, and seismic data guide every stage of oil extraction. Satellite monitoring allows companies to chart precise sub-surface formations, model drilling risks, and optimize transportation pipelines. While these technological feats generate immense profit for multinational companies, the ecological and social externalities remain concentrated on local communities. Oil spills, mangrove destruction, and coastal contamination compromise fisheries and livelihoods. The Ovimbundu saying captures this tension poetically: “Ossombe ovala mpassa, k’ewe kavaluka”—the river that nourishes also destroys if misused. Angola’s oil basin illustrates the recurring pattern: Africa’s natural wealth is meticulously mapped, claimed, and monetized, while local populations receive minimal benefit and bear disproportionate cost.

 

Tanzania’s Rare Earth Deposits

 

Tanzania has emerged in the past decade as a crucial player in global rare earth elements (REEs), which are vital for electronics, magnets, wind turbines, and electric vehicles. The districts of Songwe, Mbeya, and the Mahenge region are rich in niobium, tantalum, and rare earth oxides. According to the United States Geological Survey, Tanzania holds over 16% of the world’s identified REE reserves, a fact that has drawn multinational mining corporations, Chinese state-owned companies, and investors seeking strategic leverage in green technologies.

 

The extraction of rare earths is technologically complex and environmentally damaging. Open-pit mining, chemical leaching, and tailings storage threaten water quality and farmland, while the influx of foreign corporations reshapes social and economic dynamics. Local communities often find themselves marginalized, with limited employment opportunities or revenue-sharing mechanisms. As the Sukuma proverb notes: “Amba ya mulungu haija, lwatu lwiya lwatuka”—when the god’s voice is absent, the people suffer. Mapping, GIS systems, and predictive satellite analyses have transformed Tanzania’s rare earths into globally sought commodities, yet the moral and material benefits for Tanzanians remain tenuous.

 

Across these three resource regions, a pattern emerges: the contours of Africa’s mineral and energy wealth are meticulously mapped, quantified, and pre-emptively monetized, while the communities who live on the land face ecological degradation, economic marginalization, and social disruption. The proverb of the Ashanti is a fitting conclusion: “Sika biara wo fie a, enka wo nkorɔfo nsa”—when wealth sits in the house, it must reach the hands of the people. Yet, in Congo, Angola, and Tanzania, wealth is captured before it reaches human hands, leaving behind the scars of exploitation, the residue of greed, and the urgent moral imperative to rethink governance, justice, and African sovereignty over mapped resources.

 

References

 

Cobalt Institute. (2023). Cobalt Market Report 2023. Retrieved from https://www.cobaltinstitute.org/resource/cobalt-market-report-2023/

 

Modern Diplomacy. (2025, June 8). Cobalt mining in the Democratic Republic of Congo: How long can we ignore the costs? Retrieved from https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2025/06/08/cobalt-mining-in-the-democratic-republic-of-congo-how-long-can-we-ignore-the-costs/

 

World Bank. (2023). Cobalt in the Democratic Republic of Congo: Market analysis. Retrieved from https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/099500001312236438/p1723770a0f570093092050c1bddd6a29df

 

Energy Capital & Power. (2024, January 22). Angola oil production averaged 1.098 M BPD in 2023. Retrieved from https://energycapitalpower.com/angola-oil-production-2023/

 

CEIC Data. (2023, November). Angola crude oil: Production, 2006 – 2024. Retrieved from https://www.ceicdata.com/en/indicator/angola/crude-oil-production

 

Trading Economics. (2023). Angola crude oil production. Retrieved from https://tradingeconomics.com/angola/crude-oil-production

 

The Energy Year. (2023). Angola – Oil and gas industry. Retrieved from https://theenergyyear.com/market/angolas-energy-industry/

 

Reuters. (2025, August 13). Inside the mine that feeds the tech world – and funds Congo’s rebels. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/inside-mine-that-feeds-tech-world-funds-congos-rebels-2025-08-13/

 

Reuters. (2025, August 12). US imposes sanctions on Congo armed group, mining firms over illicit minerals. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/us-imposes-sanctions-congo-armed-group-mining-firms-over-illicit-minerals-2025-08-12/

 

Reuters. (2025, August 15). Sustainable Switch: DR Congo and the cost of tech. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/sustainable-switch-dr-congo-cost-tech-2025-08-15/

 

World Population Review. (2023). Rare earth reserves by country 2025. Retrieved from https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/rare-earth-reserves-by-country

 

Trade.gov. (2023). Tanzania rare earth and critical minerals. Retrieved from https://www.trade.gov/market-intelligence/tanzania-rare-earth-and-critical-minerals

 

Mining Weekly. (2023, May 5). Ngualla rare earth project, Tanzania – update. Retrieved from https://www.miningweekly.com/article/ngualla-rare-earth-project-tanzania-update-2023-05-05

 

TanzaniaInvest. (2023). Tanzania’s Ngualla Rare Earth recognized as one of the best undeveloped projects. Retrieved from https://www.tanzaniainvest.com/mining/tanzanias-ngualla-rare-earth-recognized-as-one-of-the-best-undeveloped-projects

 

Niwa Minerals Connect. (2023). Rare earth elements found in Tanzania. Retrieved from https://niwa.ltd/rare-earth-elements-found-in-tanzania/

 

LinkedIn. (2023). Tanzania’s rare earth reserve potential for socioeconomic development. Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/tanzanias-rare-earth-reserve-potential-socioeconomic-ibrahim-marwa-gcfef

 

African Green Minerals Observatory. (2023). Rare earth minerals. Retrieved from https://www.africangreenminerals.com/minerals/rare-earth-minerals

 

Copyright Page

Chapter 3 — The Cartography of Greed

© 2025 Emmanuel Mihiingo Kaija

All rights reserved. No part of this chapter may be reproduced, published, or broadcast in any form or by any means, including electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or any other information storage and retrieval system, without prior written permission from the author, except in the case of brief quotations used in scholarly or critical works and social sharing or discussions.

This chapter contains original research, analysis, and synthesis of historical, economic, and environmental data, alongside African proverbs and cultural references. The content is intended for educational, academic, and literary purposes.

Disclaimer:

While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information presented, the author and publisher assume no responsibility for errors, omissions, or any outcomes resulting from the application of the chapter’s content. Maps, statistics, and historical accounts are drawn from publicly available sources and scholarly research. Any reference to specific companies, governments, or organizations is for analytical purposes and not intended as legal or financial advice.

Requests for Permission:

For permissions to reproduce content, excerpts, or visual material from this chapter, please contact:

Emmanuel Mihiingo Kaija

Email: Emkaijawrites@gmail.com

Whatsapp: +256(0)765871126